10:53PM As unsympathetic as the portrayal of Zuckerberg was in The Social Network, any guy who comes up with descriptors like " the Winkelvii" is okay in my book.10:41PM Expletive Deleted! GET A LIFE! I CANNOT STAND THESE PUTRID RATS EITHER!.they are in NO WAY entitled to FB's earnings. even IF zuckerberg did build on their idea, they didn't create the business that Facebook is. The New York Times says, ".when you grow up, say, tall, rich, and handsome, you might not have to work to attract the other (or same) sex, and then you might never develop certain evolutionary pluses, like the ability to overcome adversity, accept defeat, and learn humility."Īt last count, in response to a poll in the Guardian that asked, "Were the Winklevoss twins entitled to more?" 18.6% said "Yes" and 81.4% said "No."Ĭomments at the end of the poll were more telling.
LOST TWINS GAME READ BETWEEN THE LINES FIND CEO FULL
Their attorney, Jerome Falk, said in a statement that his clients would ask for a hearing by a full 11-judge panel (We, in California, hope they pay the court costs because the State surely doesn't have the money right now). That point has now been reached."īefore the ink was dry on the Court ruling, the twins promised to press forward with another appeal. At some point, litigation must come to an end. In delivering the Court's ruling, the Chief Judge, Alex Kozinsky, hit the nail on the head by saying "The Winklevosses are not the first parties bested by a competitor who then seek to gain through litigation what they were unable to achieve in the marketplace.
The twins and their friend will have to settle for a share of Facebook now estimated to be worth $160 million (and growing). A three-judge appellate court panel upheld a 2008 deal between the trio and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg. Can you imagine being beaten again and again by a college dropout that does not come from blue blood stock? Well, it happened again to the Winklevoss twins and their Harvard classmate Divya Narendra.
0 kommentar(er)
